English
12622
Which one is the next generation Ethereum killer, XRP or SOL? executive summaryThis report is relevant to XRP Ledger (XRPL) and Solana (SOL) as“Next generation Ethereum killer”A comprehensive and in-depth analysis of its potential has been conducted. Through a systematic comparison of their technical architecture, performance indicators, ecosystem maturity, regulatory environment and strategic positioning, the report draws the following core conclusions: XRPL and Solana None of them has the universal potential to replace Ethereum, but each shows unique competitive advantages in specific fields and poses a targeted challenge to Ethereum's dominance. XRP LedgerIts core competency lies in its design tailored for traditional financial and institutional use cases. Its federated Byzantine Agreement ( FBA ) enables extremely fast, predictable, and low-cost trade finality, and in partnership with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) lawsuit brought regulatory clarity that few other crypto-assets have achieved. The platform is not a general smart contract platform, but an efficient, compliant, financial infrastructure focused on payment and asset tokenization, aiming to achieve seamless integration with the traditional financial system. SolanaThe core advantage lies in the pursuit of ultimate performance. Proved by history ( Proof of History, PoH ) and parallel processing and other innovative technologies, it is significantly ahead of Ethereum in both theoretical and actual throughput, and has successfully spawned the booming decentralized finance ( DeFi ), non-fungible tokens ( NFT )and Web3 Gaming and other consumer ecosystems. However, its history of multiple network outages has been documented, as well as the real TPS middle“vote trading”The huge proportion poses continuous challenges to its decentralization and network robustness. In summary,XRPLand Solana Not direct competitors, but represent two completely different L1 Blockchain development path: XRP Targeting the efficiency and compliance-driven institutional market, while Solana It focuses on the consumer market driven by performance and user experience. The future competitive landscape is more likely to evolve into the coexistence of multiple chains rather than one dominant player. for real “killer”It is not a single chain, but the entire emerging blockchain ecosystem that jointly challenges the hegemony of the traditional centralized system. Chapter 1: Introduction ——The battle for the throne in L1 realm1.1 Analyze the connotation and standards of “Ethereum Killer”“Ethereum Killer”（Ethereum Killer ) is a term that, since its inception, has carried the collective vision of the crypto world to break monopolies and achieve technological breakthroughs. However, as the blockchain industry develops, its connotation has also undergone evolution. Initially, it was understood simply as a single blockchain capable of completely replacing Ethereum’s dominance. But based on Ethereum’s strong network effects, large developer community, and established trust foundation, this one-size-fits-all definition has become oversimplified and unrealistic. Therefore, this report will redefine“Ethereum Killer”This narrative understands them as competitors that form significant advantages in specific core dimensions (such as scalability, fees, developer ecology, or market positioning), thereby eroding Ethereum's market share in certain areas. Based on this, the report will establish a multi-dimensional evaluation standard to measure rigorously and objectively XRPL and Solana real competitiveness. These standards include: Technical performance: The core indicator is throughput (TPS), transaction finality ( Finality ) and average transaction fees. These indicators directly determine the network's ability to handle large-scale applications and user experience. Ecosystem maturity: Measure the activity of its developer community and total locked value (TVL),as well as DeFi、NFT、GameFi Diversity and innovation vitality of applications. Network robustness: Evaluate the network's security, decentralization, censorship resistance, and historical record of reliability, such as network outages. Markets and Regulation: Examining the network's strategic positioning, its appeal to institutions, and its legal and compliance status will be critical to large-scale mainstream adoption. 1.2 Report Scope and Analysis FrameworkThis report aims to provide a systematic, data-based analytical framework toXRP Ledgerand Solana Benchmark against the current status and future roadmap of Ethereum. The report will first analyze the technical moat and core challenges of Ethereum as an industry leader. Subsequently, we will discuss in depth XRPL and Solana Its unique architecture, performance, ecological development and difficulties it faces. The core part of the report will be Chapter 5. Through a detailed table and multi-dimensional comparison, theXRPLand Solana Comprehensive showdown on key metrics. Finally, the report will provide a concluding assessment, exploring XRP and SOL whether it can really become“Ethereum Killer”, and look forward to the future competitive landscape of multi-chain coexistence. This report aims to go beyond superficial propaganda slogans and provide readers with in-depth insights that are truly valuable for decision-making reference. Chapter 2: Ethereum ——The Structure and Challenges of the Defending KingAs the second largest cryptocurrency network by market capitalization, Ethereum has always been a decentralized application (dApps) and the flagship platform for smart contracts. However, before the transformation of its core technology architecture, the network had long been plagued by issues such as scalability, high costs, and environmental sustainability. 2.1 Technological innovation in the post-merger era: PoS and Sharding roadmap2022Year9In March, Ethereum completed a historic“merge”（The Merge ), transforming its consensus mechanism from energy-intensive proof-of-work ( PoW ) Complete Transition to Proof-of-Stake ( PoS ). The core goal of this upgrade is to solve the PoW Three major problems faced: extremely high energy consumption, expensive transaction fees and limited throughput. Ethereum’s energy consumption reduced after merger99.95%, an annual decrease of approximately1100tons of carbon emissions, making it a more environmentally sustainable network. At the same time, it also lowers the threshold for participating in network security, and anyone can stake 32 ETH Become a validator instead of relying on expensive mining equipment. Although the merger significantly improved energy efficiency and security, the transaction throughput of the Ethereum mainnet ( TPS ) did not immediately receive a significant increase and remained at15-20level of one transaction, which directly led to sky-high prices during periods of network congestion. Gas fee. To solve this scalability bottleneck, Ethereum has adopted“by Rollup as the center”expansion roadmap. The core idea of this strategy is to move most of the transaction processing from the main chain to the so-called “Layer 2”（L2 ) network, while the Ethereum mainnet acts as a safe and reliable settlement layer and data availability layer. These L2 network (such as Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups ) packages and processes thousands of transactions off-chain, then submits a simple proof or state data to the mainnet for final confirmation. This layered architecture promises to transform Ethereum’s theory into TPS Push up to100,000above. 2.2 Ethereum’s moat: network effects, developer ecology and decentralizationThe moat of Ethereum is not only technical, but also social. as L1A pioneer in public chains, it has established strong first-mover advantages and network effects. Its large developer community is unmatched by other public chains, resulting in a rich set of tools, libraries, and verified smart contracts that greatly reduces the development costs and time-to-market of new projects. Additionally, the Ethereum Virtual Machine ( EVM ) has become an industry standard, which makes dApps Can easily be compatible with EVM Other on-chain deployments further consolidate its role as“Cryptoworld operating platform”status. Ethereum also maintains its leadership position when it comes to decentralization. although Solanaand XRPL Competitors such as Ethereum have innovated on certain performance metrics, but Ethereum has the largest number of validators, and its layered architecture helps by distributing validation work to different L2 network, further enhancing the overall degree of decentralization, thereby improving decentralization, security and scalability.“trilemma”A unique balance has been achieved. Chapter 3: XRP Ledger - the underlying protocol for financeXRP Ledger (XRPL) It is not a new project, since2012Since its inception in 2016, it has emerged as a mature first-layer ( L1 ) Blockchain has been operating reliably for more than ten years. XRPL The design concept and market positioning have been closely related to Ethereum and Solana There is a fundamental difference, and at its core it is about providing an efficient, predictable and compliant underlying infrastructure for traditional financial and institutional use cases. 3.1 Consensus mechanism and technical architecture: efficiency and trade-offs of the FBA protocolXRPLThe core consensus mechanism is a unique Federated Byzantine Agreement ( Federated Byzantine Agreement, FBA ). with Ethereum PoS or bitcoin PoW different, FBA Does not rely on energy-intensive mining or competition based on large stakings. On the contrary, the core principle is “trust-based authentication”（Trust-Based Validation）。 Each participant autonomously selects a trusted list of validators (often called a unique node list,Unique Node List, UNL), these validators are run by different individuals and organizations and are expected to adhere to the protocol rules in most cases. When a new proposed ledger version is adopted by a large enough proportion (more than 80%) approves, the network reaches consensus and verifies the ledger. FBAThe design concept of the consensus mechanism is“A little trust goes a long way” , which is similar to what Bitcoin and Ethereum are pursuing“no trust required”The models are in stark contrast. This fundamental design trade-off makes XRPL Able to bypass computing power competition or staking competition, achieving extremely high transaction processing speed and certainty. if more than 20%If a validator misbehaves, the network will halt progress instead of confirming invalid transactions or a fork. This high-determinism design makes it ideal for financial application scenarios that require reliability and predictability, such as cross-border payments. 3.2 Performance Overview: TPS, Transaction Finality and Low CostXRPL's performance parameters are a direct reflection of its tailor-made design for financial use cases. The network is able to handle 1,500 TPS , transaction finality (i.e. the transaction is finally confirmed) is usually3-5Achieved within seconds. This fast and stable finality is critical for large financial transactions that require atomic settlement, significantly reducing counterparty risk. In terms of transaction costs,XRPLAlso has significant advantages. a typical XRPL Transaction fees are extremely low, only approx.$0.0002 . with Ethereum Gas The fees are different, XRPL The transaction fees are not paid to the verifier, but are“destroy”（permanently destroyed ), which gives XRP Deflationary properties of tokens. This low-cost mechanism makes micropayments and real-time settlements economically feasible, providing the basis for high-frequency, low-value use cases. It is worth noting thatXRPLThe concept of transaction finality is rigorous and detailed. Only when a transaction is included in a “Verified ledger”Only then are the results considered final and irreversible. This means that even if a transaction initially appears to be successful, it may fail in the final ledger due to ordering rules, and vice versa, demonstrating the protocol’s rigor in handling complex scenarios. 3.3 Ecosystem and application scenarios: from cross-border payments to institutional-level DeFiXRPLThe ecosystem is not like Ethereum or Solana prosperous consumers dApp Market-focused, but focused on serving specific vertical areas. Its core use cases include: Cross-border payment: through its“On-demand liquidity”（On-Demand Liquidity, ODL ) solution, XRP as a“Bridging assets”, which can realize instant conversion between two different legal currencies at very low cost, thereby eliminating the need for expensive pre-financing accounts ( nostro accounts ) needs. Asset Tokenization ( RWA）： XRPLProvides built-in tools and protocols to support physical assets ( RWAs ) and have compliance functions, such as KYC/AML , transfer limits and audit trails. and Franklin Templeton and DBS The cooperation with traditional financial giants further proves that XRPL Potential in high-value assets such as tokenized money market funds. Built-in decentralized exchange ( DEX）： XRPLThe protocol has a built-in DEX , allowing users to trade any tokenized asset directly on the chain without the need for smart contracts. Institutional level DeFi： althoughXRPLof DeFi Ecological scale is relatively small, but it is attracting DeXRP and other projects, and provides a compliant trading platform for institutional participants. XRPLThe depth of penetration in institutions and traditional finance is one of its strongest advantages. American Express, Santander, CIBC and japan SBI Holdings and other global financial institutions are exploring or using XRPL/Ripple technology, which directly demonstrates the network’s ability to deliver efficient, low-cost enterprise-class solutions. This shows XRPL It does not try to copy Ethereum's general smart contract ecosystem, but serves vertical fields that require efficiency and compliance through its unique underlying architecture. 3.4 Regulation and Compliance: Judgments and Impact of SEC Litigation CasesXRPLThe regulatory outlook is its unique advantage over the competition. Start with 2020Year12month SEC The lawsuit ended in2025Year8The month ended with both parties reaching a settlement and withdrawing their appeal. The nearly five-year legal battle XRP Brings unprecedented regulatory clarity. core ruling by judgeAnalisa Torresexist2023Year7month made, she ruled XRP Direct sales to institutional investors constitute unregistered securities, but those on the secondary market“programmatic sales”are not considered securities. The final settlement includes Ripple pay1.25billion in civil penalties, far less than SEC originally requested20billion dollars. The far-reaching impact of this judgment is that itXRPEstablishing a clear legal position in the crypto world. While most other cryptoassets are still “Is it a security?”When struggling in the twilight zone, XRP A landmark court ruling has been obtained. This legal certainty is XRPL One of the strongest moats, it greatly reduces the compliance risks of traditional financial institutions and large enterprises entering the crypto world. This advantage goes far beyond mere technical performance; XRPL exist RWA Further adoption in areas such as tokenization and cross-border payments provides strong endorsement. 3.5 Future roadmap: Hooks, EVM sidechain and RWA upgradeIn order to make up for its shortcomings in general programmability,XRPLCore functionality is being actively developed. Among them, the most concerned ones are Hooks and EVM Side chain: Hooks： This is a lightweight, efficientWebAssemblymodule, allowing developers to XRPL Custom logic is attached to the account to implement simplified smart contract functionality. EVM Side chain: XRPLplanned in2025Launched in the second quarter of the year EVM Sidechains are designed to be compatible with the Ethereum ecosystem and attract Solidity developers and huge EVM User groups. This side chain will be XRP As a native token and utilizing a decentralized bridge to ensure XRP of1:1circulation. XRPLIts future roadmap shows that it is not resting on its laurels, but is trying to strategically expand its functionality while maintaining its core strengths (speed, cost, compliance). Through these measures, XRPL is trying to capture the wider market without compromising the positioning of its core financial infrastructure. Chapter 4: Solana - a testing ground for high-performance computingsince2017Since its inception, Solana has always been known for its pursuit of extreme performance, aiming to become a solution that can handle large-scale decentralized applications ( dApps ) high-performance public chain. Its unique hybrid consensus mechanism and architectural innovation enable it to achieve a significant leadership position in transaction speed and throughput. 4.1 Consensus mechanism and technical architecture: innovative combination of PoH + PoSSolanaThe core technology is historically proven ( Proof of History, PoH ), an innovative mechanism designed to solve time synchronization problems in blockchain networks. PoH Create a hash function by running it continuously“Decentralized clock”, generates a verifiable timestamp for each transaction. This mechanism allows validators to independently timestamp transactions without communicating with each other, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of parallel processing. PoHand Delegated Equity Proof ( DPoS ) combined to form Solana hybrid consensus mechanism. DPoS Responsible for selecting leaders to produce blocks, while PoH Then ensure that the transactions in these blocks are arranged in chronological order. also, Solana Other key architectural innovations have also been introduced to optimize network performance: Gulf Stream： a kind of nothingmempoolProtocol that allows validators to pre-forward transactions to the intended leader, thereby reducing transaction confirmation time. Turbine： A hierarchical block propagation mechanism that breaks blocks into smaller parts and distributes them to other validators through a tree-like network structure to alleviate network congestion and bandwidth bottlenecks。 Sealevel： A parallel processing technique that allowsSolanaProcess thousands of smart contracts simultaneously instead of just one at a time like Ethereum. SolanaEvery architectural innovation of“Performance first”core philosophy. It sacrifices a certain level of hardware threshold (validators require high-performance hardware) and short-term robustness in exchange for scalability that far exceeds that of its peers. 4.2 Performance Overview: Theoretical High Throughput vs. Real World PerformanceSolanaperformance data is often used as its“Ethereum Killer”The cornerstone of narrative. Its theory is the highest TPS Reachable65,000The above even briefly broke through in the stress test. 100,000 TPS . However, behind these numbers there is a significant “theory and reality”gap. according toSolscandata, Solana The actual user transaction throughput of is approximately 1,050 TPS , well below its advertised peak. The main reason for this difference is the so-called “vote trading”（Vote Transactions ). These transactions are submitted by validators in order to participate in the consensus process, and they occupy Solana total TPS approximately two-thirds of the total, but does not represent actual user activity such as token transfers or smart contract interactions. In terms of transaction finality,SolanaThe finality of ( Finalized ) usually requires12.8seconds, this is faster than XRPL of3-5Seconds are longer. although Solana Different confirmation levels are provided ( Processed, Confirmed, Finalized ) to balance speed and security, but this is still a disadvantage for applications that require instant, atomic settlement. In addition, an item called Alpenglow The proposal aims to shorten the finality time to approx.150milliseconds, which indicates Solana The community is actively addressing this issue. 4.3 Ecosystem and Application Scenarios: Prosperity and Challenges of DeFi, NFT, and GameFiSolanaThe low cost and high speed make it suitable for consumer-oriented applications such as NFT Minting, high-frequency trading and Web3 An ideal platform for games). This is similar to Ethereum and XRPL This is in stark contrast to the latter, which are either limited by higher fees or focus on specific financial niches. Solana ecosystem is more“consumer internet”attribute, its DeFi TVL A breakthrough130billion dollars, DEX The transaction volume also once exceeded Ethereum. SolanaKey projects in the ecosystem include: DeFi： Kamino Finance(Loan Agreement), Jupiter（DEX aggregator) and Raydium wait. NFT： SolanaWith its low minting and transaction costs, it becomes NFT One of the market leaders. Magic Eden and Tensor platforms have attracted large numbers of users, while technological innovations such as state compression have enabled large-scale NFT Casting became economically viable. 4.4 Network stability and reliability analysis: historical downtime events and their causesalthoughSolanaIt performs well in terms of performance, but its history of multiple network outages raises significant questions about its reliability. since 2021Since years, Solana Experienced multiple complete network outages for reasons including NFT Transaction spam attacks caused by minting bots, vulnerabilities in fork selection logic, and other software bug 。 These outages exposedSolanaVulnerability of the microcontroller architecture: When the network is congested, due to the lack of effective flow control and priority fee mechanisms, it cannot resist high-frequency spam transaction attacks, resulting in consensus interruption and network downtime. according to CAP In theory, a decentralized system must make trade-offs between consistency, availability, and partition tolerance. Solana In the pursuit of extreme performance, its usability has been compromised many times. Although the team has implemented multiple fixes such as reimplementing QUIC agreement and the introduction of priority fees, but its“Unreliable”negative narratives are still difficult to eradicate, which constitutes a“Enterprise level”and“mission critical”significant doubts about its application potential. 4.5 Core technology breakthrough: State Compression and Alpenglow proposalSolanaThe community is solving its core problems through continued technological innovation. Among them, state compression technology is a major breakthrough. This technology utilizes Merkle tree, which combines large amounts of data such as NFT metadata) is stored off-chain, while only the root hash is stored on-chain. This greatly reduces on-chain storage costs, making it possible to mint millions of NFT The cost is only a few hundred dollars, making large-scale use cases economically feasible. In addition, the community governance stageAlpenglowThe proposal aims to change block finality from12.8seconds drastically reduced to approx.150millisecond. This shows Solana The community and team have a clear understanding of the problem and have strong technical execution capabilities. Chapter 5: All-out Showdown ——In-depth comparison of key indicators of XRP and SOLXRP Ledgerand Solana There are fundamental differences in design concepts and strategic positioning. XRPL Aims to become a traditional financial“Internet of Value”,and Solana is committed to becoming a consumer-oriented“High performance computing platform”. This chapter will reveal their similarities and differences in key indicators through a comprehensive comparison. 5.1 Performance and scalabilityThe table below compares in detailXRPL、Solana and Ethereum’s performance on core performance metrics.
Export to Google Sheets From the performance data,XRPLThe advantage lies in its stable, predictable and extremely fast deterministic finality, which gives it a unique advantage in the payment field. XRPL actual TPS is close to the theoretical value because it does not resemble Solana Such huge non-user transactions (such as voting transactions) artificially inflate the data. Solana The advantage lies in its huge throughput potential in consumer application scenarios, and its low cost and high speed make it attractive for applications that require high-frequency, low-cost interactions. However, its longer finality time ( 12.8seconds) and historical downtime records are its main shortcomings. 5.2 Decentralization and securityDecentralization is a multi-dimensional concept, andXRPLand Solana There are challenges in this dimension. XRP Ledger： XRPLIts decentralization is reflected in its public openness, and anyone can build on it. However, its UNL The pattern depends to some extent on“trust”,and Ripple The company is in UNL ’s influence has raised questions about centralization. Solana： SolanaThe decentralization is limited by the high-performance hardware requirements of its validator nodes, which leads to higher costs of running nodes, which may lead to the centralization of staking. In terms of security and robustness,XRPLDemonstrated extremely high reliability over the past decade, with more than6300Ten thousand error-free ledgers. In contrast, Solana Its history of downtime, particularly multiple network outages caused by transaction spam and software bugs, raises significant questions about its reliability. This shows Solana While pursuing the ultimate performance, a trade-off is made between decentralization and usability. Its technology roadmap is trying to introduce QUIC Mechanisms such as protocols and priority fees are used to make up for these shortcomings. 5.3 Ecological maturityThe maturity of an ecosystem reflects the outcomes of different strategic positions. Solana： With its performance advantages,Solanaexist DeFi、NFT and Web3 Significant progress has been made in consumer-facing applications such as gaming. That DeFi TVL and DEX Volume data points to strong traction in this space. Its developer community is large and active, especially in EVM Compatibility aspect. XRP Ledger： XRPLecosystem growth relies more on bottom-up community projects (such as DeXRP ) and top-down institutional collaboration. Its developer community is relatively niche but highly focused, focusing on payments, asset tokenization, and institutional-grade applications. 5.4 Strategic positioning and market audienceThis isXRPLand Solana the most fundamental difference between. XRP Ledger： clearly position itself as“financial infrastructure”and“Internet of Value” . Its core audience is banks, payment companies, enterprises and institutions, aiming to solve the inefficiency and high cost problems of the traditional financial system. Solana： clearly position itself as“High performance general computing platform” . Its core audience is consumers, Web3 Developers and retail users aim to build a high-speed, low-cost network that is comparable to existing Internet services. Web3 application layer. 5.5 Supervision and GovernanceRegulatory status: XRPLexist SEC The unique regulatory clarity gained following the lawsuit makes it the preferred entry point into the crypto world for traditional financial institutions. In contrast, Solana and other public chains still face“Is it a security?”legal uncertainty. On-chain governance: XRPLuse“amendment”（Amendments ) governance model that requires a super-majority vote of validators to enable new features. Solana then adopt DPoS Voting governance, validators vote to decide on protocol upgrades based on the amount of pledged tokens. Chapter Six: Conclusion and Outlook ——Who can challenge Ethereum’s dominance?6.1 Final assessment of XRP: an “Ethereum killer” or a complementary financial infrastructure?Based on comprehensive analysis,XRP LedgerNot a direct competitor to Ethereum, it was never intended to be a universal, universal dApp smart contract platform. Its core values are its specificity, efficiency and regulatory clarity. Its relationship with Ethereum is more likely to be complementary than replacement. XRPL Its design makes it ideal for handling cross-border payments, asset tokenization, and institutional-grade compliance products, areas that the Ethereum mainnet struggles to effectively serve due to high fees and low throughput. XRPLThe biggest challenge is how to pass it while maintaining its core advantages (speed, cost, compliance) Hooks and EVM Initiatives such as sidechains are successfully attracting a wider range of developers and use cases. However, its SEC The unique regulatory clarity gained after the lawsuit provides a strong endorsement for its position in the traditional financial market worth more than a trillion dollars. From this perspective, XRPL more like SWIFT and traditional financial infrastructure“killer”, not Ethereum’s. 6.2 Final evaluation of Solana: Is it an “Ethereum killer” or another high-performance track king?SolanaIt is currently the most promising“Ethereum Killer”candidate whose technical architecture and performance data make it the only one capable of competing with Ethereum in large-scale consumer applications L1 . Its in DeFi and NFT Its success in the field proves the superiority of its architecture, while technological innovations such as state compression enable it to continue to reduce the cost of mass adoption. SolanaThe biggest challenge remains its network reliability. Although multiple fixes have been implemented, its historical record of outages has taken a toll on brand trust. Future success will depend on whether it can completely solve network stability problems and continue to consolidate its performance advantages through technological innovations such as state compression, ultimately proving its “high performance”Not just a short-lived experiment, but a sustainable, trustworthy solution. 6.3 Market Prospects and Future Trends: Final Conjectures under the Coexistence of Multiple ChainsThe final conclusion of this report is:“Ethereum Killer”This concept itself is a false proposition. The future of blockchain is not the victory of a single chain, but the coexistence of multiple chains. The future market division of labor is likely to be as follows: Ethereum: will continue to be the key player in the crypto world“value settlement layer”and “L2 ecology center”, providing the highest level of decentralization and security. Solana： expected to become“consumer application layer”, carrying applications that require high-frequency, low-cost interaction, such as games, social networking and NFT。 XRP Ledger： With its unique compliance advantages and technical design, it will become“Institutional financial settlement layer”, serving cross-border payments, RWA Tokenization and institutional-grade compliance products. for real“killer”not a single L1 , but the entire emerging blockchain ecosystem jointly challenges the hegemony of traditional centralized finance and the Internet. XRPL and Solana All are key forces in this revolution, but they play different roles and serve different markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
