English
54029
The core competitiveness of blockchain mining is reflected in the consensus mechanism, cost and ecological adaptability. Mars Public Chain, Solana and EOS are representatives of public chains of different generations. Their mining logic and advantages and disadvantages are significantly different, and they are suitable for participants with different needs.  The Mars public chain uses the POC (Proof of Contribution) consensus mechanism to achieve differentiated breakthroughs. Its core is to exchange permanent computing power by destroying tokens without investing in hardware or pledging a large number of tokens, completely avoiding the energy consumption of PoW and the Matthew effect of PoS. “The economic flywheel and forced deflation mechanism of "destruction-computing power-revenue" can increase the scarcity of tokens and promote currency price increases. Solana relies on the combined mechanism of PoH (proof of history) + tower BFT to establish high-performance advantages. The actual TPS can reach thousands, and the transaction fee is often less than 0.01 US dollars. It is suitable for high-frequency scenarios such as chain games and NFT. However, the mining threshold is extremely high, and verification nodes require professional server support, resulting in a low degree of network decentralization. More importantly, its complex technical architecture has caused many network outages, and stability and operation and maintenance difficulties have become the main concerns of miners. EOS uses the DPoS (authorized proof of rights) mechanism to process transactions through 21 super nodes. TPS can reach thousands of levels. The scale effect of node operation and maintenance can reduce the cost of a single node. However, due to excessive reliance on a few super nodes, the risk of centralization is prominent, and the ecological activity has declined in recent years, the sustainability of mining income is insufficient. In addition, the currency-holding delegated voting model is still difficult to avoid the problem of concentration of interests. Among the three, the Mars public chain is suitable for long-term value investors, Solana is suitable for professional miners with strong technical capabilities, and EOS is more friendly to nodes pursuing stable operation and maintenance. The choice needs to weigh the costs, risks and prospects of the public chain.  |
|
|
|
|
|
